When most people think about self harm, they think razor blades.
What if I told you about a paper I was writing about the differences in psychological/cognitive distortion between blunt-force self-harm and instrument assisted self-harm? Why bother differentiating between the two and why would I be writing about it? The use of pronouns in speech are functionally inoperable for me. I think its pathological. Perhaps its cognitive but who knows. Point is, I’m different, and its my job to qualify and quantify why. But why explore this sort of things in such a public setting? I think our paths converge at some point. We might have wished we did. They couldn’t have accounted for it. You got to forgive them. I can help some future peeps with this, so you got to let me. If You can advocate for me to do my work, please visit here.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0379073804000544
Morbid as it may be, I think this guy above is worth studying. I’m hoping this isn’t an AI made picture but I have a hypothesis for this. Find the article here. Why did he do this? How come he didn’t have anything to live for? This makes me sad. The dead hold secrets which benefit the living, and what’s better? They don’t fight back, and they won’t suffer. As someone with a very close-personal relationship with physical pain, I think the Forensic Examiners in this case are doing Evangelical work. God’s Work.
For those of you that may be worried, I’m genuinely ok. Money could be better, but ok. I’m looking for something useful or valuable to do with my time. Something I can do well, get paid for and something I don’t hate or have to burn myself out over. Helping to reveal the true state of affairs regarding these people could give my life meaning and purpose and community and affluence and Perhaps; pain too.
