The Dissolution of “I” is a touchy subject. Describing the boundaries between “I” and “You” is touchy because it attempts to relate hegemonic faculties of our existence using plain language. This plain language can, for the most part, fail in capturing the pure qualia of existence in pure annotative form. Reality becomes a lackluster representation of truth. Perhaps the truth is oppressive, violent, perverted or disrespectful. Do these representations of truth have leverage, in relation to the collective awareness of the community upon which it is interdependent? Of course it does! This does not change the vehemence with which it is rejected. Do you understand?
The master-slave arguments of Friedrich Nietzsche and Hero-Savior archetypical tropes found in common pop culture are more prominent examples of how we humans, through sheer reasoning and intellect, can shave away, and reduce living breathing phenomena down to a handful of labels, just to be put away somewhere in a box, filed away forever! To reduce things to mere labels out of a need for control over ones environment. Mary Douglas understood this phenomenon clearly. The notion that my existence should have to fit into a pretty little box for the express purposes of appeasing sounds like slavery.
